|
|
. |
The Distance
Between Us: Cells Separated From Body Remain Connected To It
Research has shown beyond any reasonable doubt that human emotion has a
direct influence on the way our cells function in our body (reference
1).
During the 1990s, US Army scientists investigated whether or not the
power of our feelings continues to have an effect on living cells,
specifically DNA, once those cells are no longer part of the body.
If tissue samples were to be taken, would emotion still impact them
either positively or negatively?
Following traditional, everyday thinking, once tissue, skin, organs or
bones are removed from a person, any connection with those parts of the
body should no longer exist. But an experiment carried out in 1993
shows that something very different is actually happening.
The US Army performed experiments to determine precisely whether the
DNA/emotion connection continues following a separation, and if so, at
what distances does it operate? (reference 2). The researchers started
by collecting a swab of tissue and DNA from the inside of a volunteer’s
mouth. This sample was then isolated and taken to another room in the
same building, where they began to investigate a phenomenon that modern
science says should not exist. In a specially designed chamber, the DNA
was measured electrically to see if it responded to the emotions of the
person it came from, the donor who was in another room a few hundred
metres away.
In the room the ‘donor’ was in, the person was shown a series of video
images designed to create genuine states of emotion inside the body.
This material ranged from graphic wartime footage to erotic images to
comedy. The idea was for the donor to experience a spectrum of real
emotions within a brief period of time. While he was doing so, in
another room his DNA was measured for its response. When the donor
experienced emotional ‘peaks’ and ‘dips’, his cells and DNA showed
powerful electrical response at the same moment in time. Although the
distances separating the donor and the sample were a few hundred
metres, the DNA acted as if it was still physically connected to the
person’s body.
The US Army discontinued their experiments with the donor and DNA
separated by only a few hundred metres. However, one of the researchers
continued the experiments at even greater distances – up to 350 miles
(560 km) between the donor and the DNA sample (reference 3).
Furthermore, the time between the donor’s experience and the cell’s
response was gauged by an atomic clock located in Colorado. In each
experiment, the interval measured between the emotion and the cells’
response was zero….the effect was simultaneous! Whether the cells were
in the same room or separated by hundreds of kilometers , the results
were the same. When the donor had an emotional experience, the DNA
reacted as if it were still connected to the donor’s body in some way.
While this may sound quite weird, consider what this means. It means
that there must be some sort of a connecting field linking all matter
so that everything must be – and must remain – connected. As one of the
researchers said: “There is no place where one’s body actually ends and
no place where it begins.”(reference 3)
The implications of this are quite mind-boggling….If we can not
separate people from the parts of their bodies, then what happens with
organ transplants and blood transfusions? Do the two individuals
somehow remain connected to each other? And what happens to the
hundreds of contacts we have each day – by hugging someone we shed
cells, so do ‘parts’ of us remain with them? Does this mean that we
continue to be linked to the other as long as the DNA cells we share
stay alive?
The answer to these questions is yes - the link does exist.
However, the quality of the connection appears to be determined by how
conscious we are of its existence. During my own healing training we
were taught to work consciously with organ transplants – taking care to
separate the essence of the donor (and return it to them with deep
gratitude) from the organ, and to begin to infuse the organ with the
new essence of the receiver deep into the cells. Even though I learned
to do this with deep awareness, I suspect that there is a still deeper
level to this procedure involving the souls of those involved. And that
is no simple, quick fix matter!
References:
1. G. Rein, M. Atkinson and R. McCraty.
‘The Physiological and Psychological Effects of Compasion and Anger.’
Journal of Advancement in Medicine (1995), volume 8, number 2, pages
87-103.
2. J. Motz.
‘Everyone and Energy Healer: The Treat V Conference’ Santa Fe, New
Mexico. Advances: The Journal of Mind-Body Health, (1993), volume 9.
3. J. D.
Thompson. ‘The Secret Life of Your Cells’. Center for Neuroacoustic
Research (2000).
http://www.neuroacoustic.org/articles/articlecells.htm
General
reference: G. Braden. ‘The Divine Matrix: Bridging Time, Space,
Miracles and Belief’. Hay House Inc. (2007).
|
|